Background of the Study
Legal discourse in Nigeria is characterized by a formal register that aims for precision and clarity in conveying judicial decisions and legal arguments. Court transcripts, as written records of legal proceedings, serve as an essential tool for ensuring transparency and accountability in the legal system (Idris, 2023). However, the pragmatic clarity of these transcripts is influenced by factors such as legal jargon, procedural language, and the inherent complexity of legal concepts. This study undertakes a comparative analysis of court transcripts from various jurisdictions in Nigeria to evaluate how effectively legal language is integrated and understood by diverse stakeholders, including lawyers, judges, and the general public (Yakubu, 2024). By analyzing linguistic markers, speech acts, and contextual cues, the research examines whether pragmatic devices are employed to enhance clarity and reduce ambiguity in legal discourse. The study further explores the implications of any identified shortcomings for access to justice and public trust in the legal system, aiming to propose recommendations for improving communication in legal contexts (Oke, 2025).
Statement of the Problem
Although Nigerian legal discourse is intended to be clear and precise, there is evidence of pragmatic ambiguities in court transcripts that may impede understanding and access to justice. Prior research has primarily focused on legal theory and procedural aspects, with limited attention to the pragmatic elements of courtroom communication (Idris, 2023). This gap in the literature hinders efforts to ensure that legal language is accessible to non-expert audiences, potentially undermining public confidence in judicial processes. Without a thorough examination of pragmatic clarity, stakeholders remain unaware of the extent to which legal discourse may be misinterpreted. This study seeks to fill this void by providing a comparative analysis of court transcripts, highlighting areas where pragmatic adjustments could improve clarity and fairness (Yakubu, 2024).
Objectives of the Study
Research Questions
Significance of the Study
This study is significant as it investigates the pragmatic aspects of legal discourse in Nigeria, offering insights into how court transcripts can be improved to ensure clearer communication. The findings will benefit legal practitioners, policymakers, and the public by promoting a more accessible and transparent legal system (Idris, 2023; Oke, 2025).
Scope and Limitations of the Study
This study is limited to the comparative analysis of pragmatic clarity in Nigerian court transcripts.
Definitions of Terms
Abstract: This study investigates the benefits of outdoor education in promoting holistic development and le...
Background of the Study
Nigerian youth slang has emerged as a vibrant linguistic phenomenon, particularly on social media...
Background of the Study
Remote work technologies, such as video conferencing tools, cloud-based project management platforms, and virtual...
Background of the Study
Women’s political empowerment is critical for achieving gender equity and effective governance. In Ondo Wes...
Background of the Study
Infrastructure development is a cornerstone of effective early childhood education, providing the...
Background of the Study
Determining age at death is a pivotal component of forensic anthropology, particularly when dealin...
Background of the Study
The Internet of Things (IoT) is revolutionizing supply chain and inventory management across ind...
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the study is to develop a lot sizing model for growing chickens if the supplier of the products offers incrementa...
Background to the Study
The influence of colonialism on Nigeria cannot be over emphasized. The influx of white explorers, traders and mis...
Background of the study
Rural electrification is a critical component of socio-economic development, yet it remains a signi...