Background of the Study
Assessment is a fundamental component of the educational process, providing essential feedback on student learning and instructional effectiveness. At Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi State, traditional assessment methods typically rely on manual grading and standardized testing, which can be time-consuming and subject to human error. In contrast, AI-powered assessment systems utilize machine learning algorithms and data analytics to automate the evaluation process, providing consistent, rapid, and objective grading of student work (Ibrahim, 2023). These AI systems can analyze diverse forms of student responses, from multiple-choice questions to essays, ensuring a more comprehensive assessment of learning outcomes. Moreover, AI-based assessments offer the advantage of adaptive testing, where the difficulty of subsequent questions adjusts in real time based on a student’s performance, thereby offering a more personalized evaluation experience (Olu, 2024). However, despite these advantages, the integration of AI in student assessments raises concerns regarding the transparency of grading algorithms, potential biases, and the loss of nuanced human judgment. Traditional methods, while slower and less consistent, often benefit from the qualitative insights of experienced educators. Therefore, a comparative study is essential to understand the strengths and limitations of both approaches in the context of Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, accuracy, and fairness of AI-powered assessment methods relative to traditional techniques, providing evidence-based recommendations for optimizing assessment practices in higher education (Balogun, 2025).
Statement of the Problem
Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University currently faces challenges in student assessment due to the limitations inherent in traditional evaluation methods, which often rely on manual grading and are susceptible to subjectivity and inconsistency (Ibrahim, 2023). These conventional methods can result in delayed feedback and discrepancies that may affect student performance and academic progression. While AI-powered assessment systems have the potential to deliver more consistent and timely evaluations, their adoption is hindered by concerns related to algorithmic transparency, potential biases in automated grading, and the risk of reducing the qualitative judgment that human assessors provide (Olu, 2024). Additionally, there is uncertainty among educators about the reliability of AI systems, especially in assessing complex responses that require nuanced interpretation. This gap in understanding and acceptance has led to a scenario where the benefits of technological innovation are not fully realized. The lack of comprehensive comparative data between AI-powered and traditional assessment methods further complicates the decision-making process for academic administrators. This study seeks to bridge this gap by systematically comparing the two approaches, thereby identifying their respective advantages and limitations, and offering recommendations for integrating the strengths of AI into the assessment framework without compromising the value of human judgment (Balogun, 2025).
Objectives of the Study:
Research Questions:
Significance of the Study
This study is significant as it provides a critical comparison of AI-powered and traditional student assessment methods, offering insights that can enhance grading accuracy, fairness, and efficiency. The findings will inform educators and administrators at Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University on how best to integrate innovative technologies with conventional practices to improve overall educational outcomes (Ibrahim, 2023).
Scope and Limitations of the Study:
This study is limited to the evaluation of student assessment methods at Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi State.
Definitions of Terms:
• AI-Powered Assessment: The use of artificial intelligence to automate the evaluation of student work (Olu, 2024).
• Traditional Assessment: Conventional methods of evaluating student performance using manual grading (Ibrahim, 2023).
• Adaptive Testing: Assessment techniques that adjust the difficulty of questions based on student performance (Balogun, 2025).
Background Of The Study
Education, as defined by the National Policy on Education (2004), is&...
Background of the study
Intonation is a key prosodic feature that influences meaning and emotional expression in speech. I...
Background of the Study
The rise of cyber threats has emerged as a significant challenge to national and international secu...
Background of the Study
In Maiduguri, the Hausa language functions within a complex social fabric where context plays a pi...
Background of the Study
Market disruptions, driven by technological advances, regulatory changes, and unexpected economic...
Background of the Study
Television broadcasting plays a crucial role in shaping political awareness and fostering democrati...
ABSTRACT
The objective of this project include the examination of the importance of price in consumer purchase decis...
Background of the Study
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is a genetic blood disorder characterized by the production of abnormal hemoglobin, lea...
Background of the Study
Public health awareness is critical for promoting healthy behaviors and preventing disease outbrea...
Background of the Study
The vaccine supply chain plays a crucial role in ensuring the timely and efficient delivery of vaccines to popula...